Sample Results Dashboard

Explore the kind of decision support outputs you would receive from a full simulation analysis. Compare scenarios and review actionable insights.

Total Operating Cost

$118K

Scenario C (Best)

Fuel Consumption

22.8K gal

Est. 180-day total

Avg. Utilization

68%

Fleet average

Idle Hours

1,180

Total fleet

Reliability Score

98.5%

Uptime confidence

Peak Coverage

100%

Demand met

Demand vs. Available Capacity Over Time

Weekly comparison showing demand against scenario capacities

Generator Utilization by Unit

Comparison of utilization rates across scenarios

Fuel Cost Comparison

Estimated fuel costs by scenario

Idle Capacity Comparison

Total idle hours by scenario

Scenario Scorecard

Side-by-side comparison of all evaluated scenarios

Scenario	Operating Cost	Fuel (gal)	Utilization	Idle Hours	Reliability	Peak Coverage	Recommendation
Scenario A: Conservative	$142,000	28,500	52%	1,840	99.8%	100%	Safe but costly
Scenario B: Minimal	$98,000	19,200	78%	920	94.5%	92%	Risk of shortfall
Scenario C: Balanced	$118,000	22,800	68%	1,180	98.5%	100%	Recommended
Scenario D: Hybrid	$108,000	18,500	74%	980	99.2%	100%	Good alternative

Decision Insights

Key takeaways from the scenario analysis

Scenario A: Overprovisioned

Safest option but significantly overprovisioned. Operating costs are 20% higher than necessary.

Scenario B: Undersized Risk

Lowest cost but increases peak shortfall risk. May require emergency backup during high-demand periods.

Scenario C: Best Balance

Provides optimal balance between cost and reliability. Recommended for this project profile.

Scenario D: Hybrid Advantage

Battery storage reduces peak load reliance. Consider if equipment is available and load profile suits peak shaving.